Farmers Guradian
Topics
Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Arable Farming Magazine

Arable Farming Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

British Farming Awards

CropTec

LAMMA 2018

New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
Login or Register
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now

Opinion - Glyphosate debacle shows how well-fed bureaucrats risk food security

Andrew Watts, Hertfordshire farmer and former NFU combinable crops board chairman
Andrew Watts, Hertfordshire farmer and former NFU combinable crops board chairman

Andrew Watts, Hertfordshire farmer and former NFU combinable crops board chairman

 

Many people will never have heard of John Franz, a Monsanto chemist, but his discovery of glyphosate in 1970 changed the face of weed control across the world.

 

Arguably the most significant crop protection product introduced, certainly in the herbicides, it eradicated couch on farms, which was a huge problem without really effective other methods of control.

 

Its benign environmental profile and reliability brought in a new era of weed control.

 

Paraquat still had a place, but its use declined and it was later withdrawn.


The latest shenanigans in Brussels before glyphosate was granted a reprieve will do nothing to reassure farmers over the regulatory process.

 

The NFU and many others have long argued for measures to be based on risk not hazard, and yet this principle continues to be ignored.

 

Before we all get too worked up about the EU (I shall avoid that topic) our own regulators are hardly any different - as witnessed in the debate over neonicotinoid dressings.


A reprieve is just that, a temporary respite, and much work will need to be done to secure a longer term solution.


Low-till and no- till systems are heavily dependent on this product as a means of reducing cultivations, and energy inputs, seen as good things.

 

If withdrawn, it would lead to a return to multiple cultivations for weed rearrangement (rather than control).


Put simply, glyphosate is a product which at the moment is vital to many farming systems, the world over. There is no alternative product that is comparable.


Organisations may deny it, but a key driver by some non-governmental organisations to get it banned stems from its use in genetically modified (GM) crops, for weed control.

 

If it was banned then de facto we could not grow GM crops - a very limited outlook in the long term for food production.


In summary, to remove a product which is so vital to crop production the world over, on a highly debatable hazard and not risk basis, without considering the impact on food supply is a step that would only be taken by politicians with full stomachs,
21,000 people die every day in the world from starvation or malnutrition, not one death has ever been linked to glyphosate. John Franz we salute you.


Read More

Soil Association urges bread industry to ban pre-harvest glyphosate use Soil Association urges bread industry to ban pre-harvest glyphosate use

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS