Farmers Guardian
Topics
How to spot BSE and what farmers can do to prevent it

How to spot BSE and what farmers can do to prevent it

DataHub

DataHub

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Auction Finder

Auction Finder

British Farming Awards

British Farming Awards

CropTec

CropTec

LAMMA 2020

LAMMA 2020

Wales’ radical post-Brexit ag plans are not getting the scrutiny they deserve

Politicians and civil servants face a mountain of work because of Brexit, and this means the radical agriculture proposals put forward in England and Wales are not getting the scrutiny they deserve, says Glyn Roberts, FUW president.

With just over 100 days before we leave the European Union, based on events over recent weeks there is no telling what might happen over the coming hours, let alone days or weeks in terms of Brexit, the UK Government or decisions which might or might not be taken by Parliament or the people.

Like others, farmers are sick of hearing about Brexit, while also becoming increasingly worried and frustrated as we watch the clock tick down towards March 29 2019, and possible scenarios that would be disastrous not only for farming, but our economy as a whole.

As the FUW has said repeatedly, no responsible UK Government would allow us to leave the EU without a deal, and it was no surprise therefore that FUW County and Committee Chairmen unanimously supported a proposed amendment to the UK Government’s motion in support of their EU withdrawal package which would effectively prevent the UK leaving the EU without a deal.

 

Postponed

 

Within days of our decision to support that amendment, which was tabled by former Defra minister Hilary Benn, I was in the House of Commons listening first-hand to the Prime Minister’s announcement that the long anticipated ‘meaningful vote’ on the withdrawal deal was to be postponed until late January.

Watching this, and the political shenanigans and manoeuvrings that have followed, has increased concerns that a no-deal Brexit could happen almost by accident, despite all but the most reckless MPs recognising the disaster that would follow – not least for those who will be lambing over the coming weeks and months whose prices will be slashed if we lose access to the EU market after March.

And even those who don’t work in industries which rely on EU export markets and trade must recognise that a hit to the economy will mean less tax income, and so further cuts to public spending at a time when services are already buckling after years of austerity.

 

Gaping wounds

The Brexit referendum has turned pre-existing divisions into gaping wounds that threaten to permanently split not only political parties but the entire nation, and while increasing numbers support the notion that a second referendum is the only way to solve the political gridlock, the degree to which this could add to divisions has to be recognised.

Despite such deeply disturbing prospects, over recent weeks I have been heartened after meeting politicians from across the political spectrum who, despite political differences, are working together to seek solutions and common ground to minimise the dangers we now face.

 

Indeed, it was the cross-party support received by Hilary Benn’s proposed amendment already referred to that galvanised FUW support for his proposal.

 

Glimmer

I wouldn’t describe such cooperation as a Star of Bethlehem quite yet, but it is certainly a glimmer of hope, and by the time this article is published perhaps the good will of the Christmas season and some sensible New Year’s resolutions will mean we are starting to move away from the cliff edge.

With all that is going on, and total uncertainty as to what will happen over the coming weeks, let alone on March 29, making predictions for the coming year seems futile.

However, we can certainly learn lessons based on what has happened since June 2016.

 

Whatever an individual’s view on Brexit, no one would deny the negotiations, preparations and transition represent a monumental amount of additional work for Government at a time of reduced budgets and workforces due to austerity.

This is true of all Government departments in Wales and across the UK.

 

Largest

 

Just dealing with the legal work of reviewing and transposing EU-related legislation was described by the House of Commons Library as ‘...potentially one of the largest legislative projects ever undertaken in the UK.’

For UK Government departments such as Defra, the additional workload has been vast, and despite taking on an additional 1,400 members of staff, the National Audit Office highlighted in September risks that the department would not come close to undertaking all the necessary Brexit preparation work before April.

While the Welsh Government does not share the breadth of responsibilities of Defra, the additional and unavoidable workload caused by Brexit is significant across all departments.

Given such additional necessary workloads, whether in Whitehall, Westminster, Cathays Park or Cardiff Bay, the logic of ensuring no additional unnecessary work-streams are created seems self-evident, yet in relation to agricultural policies, quite the opposite has happened, with radical proposed changes to farm support and environmental measures adding not only to existing workloads for civil servants, but also uncertainty and worry for farmers.

 

Mulling over

Such proposals and additional work demands additional political scrutiny by committees in Cardiff Bay and Westminster – committees that should really be focussed on scrutinising the essential work being undertaken in relation to Brexit, rather than mulling over radical proposals such as those contained in the UK Government’s Agriculture Bill and the consultations launched in England and Wales.

And of course, legislation and proposals which have been poorly scrutinised due to other priorities makes for bad law.

It is such dangers that led the FUW to warn, on the day after the EU referendum, that ‘there is a monumental amount of work to do in terms of changing domestic arrangements and legislation, including around Welsh devolved legislation, not to mention unravelling us from the EU budget to which we were previously committed, negotiating trade deals and dealing with issues such as border controls.’

 

Sensible

 

We also called for ‘…the UK and EU to agree on a sensible timetable for Brexit after the UK electorate voted to leave the EU – or risk dire consequences for both the UK and the remaining 27 Member States’.

Not only were such warnings not heeded, but what looks very much like desperate opportunism in anticipation of being unshackled from EU regulations has added significantly and unnecessarily to workloads already at breaking point – not to mention additional worries and uncertainty for farmers already about to enter choppy if not stormy waters.

Let us hope that 2019 brings some calm after the recent political storm, and some common sense to boot.


Read More

Farmers should read the Defra consultation with alarm bells on full standby Farmers should read the Defra consultation with alarm bells on full standby
Welsh Government should not copy Gove in abolishing direct payments Welsh Government should not copy Gove in abolishing direct payments
Wrangling over UK frameworks means nations are drafting ag policy in isolation Wrangling over UK frameworks means nations are drafting ag policy in isolation

Most Recent

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS