Farmers Guardian
News
Word ‘milk’ banned for use in branding of plant-based products

Word ‘milk’ banned for use in branding of plant-based products

This Is Agriculture - Sponsored

This Is Agriculture - Sponsored

DataHub

DataHub

Auction Finder

Auction Finder

LAMMA 2020

LAMMA 2020

Multi-cut vs traditional: Traditional or multi-cut silage?

Sponsored Article

Paying attention to cut and wilt timings will help farmers boost silage quality, while adopting a multi-cut system could help some to maximise performance off the same acreage.

Cutting earlier will reduce yield, but protein, digestibility and metabolisable energy all increase
Cutting earlier will reduce yield, but protein, digestibility and metabolisable energy all increase

Traditional or multi-cut? There is a lot of talk about different silage-making strategies at present, but whatever the system used, all farmers should be challenging themselves to make better silage.

 

So says Volac business manager Darran Ward. He believes everyone could benefit from taking a fresh look at silage management.

 

“Everywhere we’re making silage, we should be challenging what we do and exploiting more out of what we’ve got,” he says.

 

Mr Ward says managing grass differently puts producers in a better position to improve milk from forage, which is ultimately linked to profit.

 

For example, Kingshay data from herds ranked by milk from forage for the year ending March 2017, shows the top 10% are producing 4,136 litres of milk from forage per cow and achieving a margin over purchased feed (MOPF) of 18.32ppl. The bottom 25% are producing just 1,176 litres from forage, and hitting a MOPF of 15.64ppl – a difference of nearly 3ppl.

 

Ensuring leys are regularly reseeded will aid silage quality. However, he thinks cutting and wilt timings are where producers could make the biggest gains. This means cutting early and wilting rapidly to produce a dry matter silage of 28-32%.

 

“I’d be challenging all farmers to go two weeks earlier than they usually do with first cut,” says Mr Ward. “If they usually cut in mid-May, aim for the end of April. This fits with when grass is higher quality, with a high D-value.”


Read More

Budgeting & planning: Think about quality to improve profitabilityBudgeting & planning: Think about quality to improve profitability
DIY silage: Case study - Joe Corp, Shepton MalletDIY silage: Case study - Joe Corp, Shepton Mallet
Forage wagons: Take more control of your silage-makingForage wagons: Take more control of your silage-making
Grass seeds & mixes: How to select grass seed mixes to suit requirementsGrass seeds & mixes: How to select grass seed mixes to suit requirements
INFOGRAPHIC: Tips on making the best silage possibleINFOGRAPHIC: Tips on making the best silage possible

Table 1: Cost comparisons between traditional and multi-cut systems
Table 1: Cost comparisons between traditional and multi-cut systems

Cut early and wilt fast

Cutting earlier, before the grass approaches heading, will reduce yield, but protein, digestibility and metabolisable energy (ME) all increase. This will support greater milk production, while a lighter crop will have less losses in the field.

 

A rapid wilt is also a must. As soon as grass is cut, sugars start to decline as they are being used by the plant, which is still living, and also by undesirable bacteria. This raises the pressure to get it in the clamp quickly. Wilting also increases the dry matter percentage and reduces clamp losses from effluent.

 

Mr Ward says there is a twohour window for producers to take advantage of in order to get an efficient wilt. This is the time when the stomata on the plant remain open and water loss is at its greatest; about 100 litres/tonne of grass every hour. After that, water is only lost where the leaves are broken or where the crop has been conditioned – if a conditioner has been used.

 

“Ideally the mower and the tedder should be in the field at the same time, or at least within two hours of each other,” says Mr Ward. This will ensure a rapid wilt is achieved.

 

This is particularly important with an early first cut, where weather conditions may not be ideal. Water loss will be highest when air moves over the crop, so ‘flicking the crop up’ with the tedder will aid evaporation. Leaving a 5-6cm stubble will also help lift the crop off the ground and expose it to air movement.

 

Producers should also take a step back and ask themselves if they could adopt a multi-cut silage system.

 

Can I do a multi-cut system?

 

The multi-cut system reduces the time between cuts from the traditional six weeks to about four weeks. This means more than three cuts are taken in the year, with some producers taking five-six. First cut is also taken earlier than traditional methods (see Silage-making strategies compared panel).

 

“It’s traditional as it’s the way we’ve always done it,” adds Mr Ward. “That alludes to the fact we haven’t really challenged what what we’ve done. Multi-cut challenges that.”

 

By cutting more frequently on a multi-cut system, grass is younger and leafier and of greater digestibility. This encourages forage dry matter intakes and provides the potential to displace bought-in feed.

 

Mr Ward believes multi-cut is one of the ways producers can boost milk from forage figures and thus MOPF, while growing more nutrients off the same acreage.

 

“Multi-cut is a way to exploit more from grass and to get the physical and financial benefit from it,” he says.

 

Although the individual cuts may be lighter – perhaps 1.6-2t/hectare (4-5t/acre) at first cut versus 3.2-4t/hectare (8-10t/acre) on a traditional system – the total dry matter yield produced through the
season is likely to be the same or more. Most notably, the quality of silage produced will be much higher (see Table 2).

 

ME increase

 

A 1MJ/kg DM increase in ME is generally recognised from moving from a traditional to multi-cut strategy. This will support milk production and also ‘more than pay’ for the extra contracting costs from cutting more frequently (see Table 1).

 

Mr Ward says improved silage quality equates to a 2ppl saving in feed costs, as a result of higher forage dry matter intakes and having to buy-in less energy and protein. However, there are some key things to think about when taking a multi-cut approach (see multi-cut – key considerations panel).

 

Mr Ward believes multi-cut is something which should be considered on many farms. However, there are some situations where it is not possible; namely if it is not possible to get contractors to cut frequently or where the farm’s location means weather is challenging.

 

“Where geography, weather and management means you can’t achieve multi-cut, then traditional silage-making is for you. But challenge yourself to see if you can go early,” Mr Ward adds.

Table 2: Typical silage analysis results on different cutting systems
Table 2: Typical silage analysis results on different cutting systems
Jason Bayley
Jason Bayley

Case study: Jason Bayley – multi-cut silage

Jason Bayley’s multi-cut silage system is all about maximising the production of energy per hectare to enable costly bought-in feeds to be displaced by quality, homegrown forage.

 

He says: “Our forage is treated almost like a concentrate, rather than a forage. We don’t want a big heap of poor quality stuff, otherwise you’re filling up space in the ration with poor quality forage. When forage is analysing similar to bought-in feed, it’s got a lot more value.”

 

The Bayleys run 565 cows across 290 hectares (720 acres) at Lady Leys Farm, Lullington, Derbyshire. The herd is milked three times a day and yields 10,800 litres at 3.9% fat and 3.3% protein.

 

In the past, silage ground was cut three-four times a year, although the fourth cut was viewed as a ‘bonus’, rather than a must. Now the farm plans to take five to six cuts a year, every five weeks, on a multi-cut system. The silagemaking season also starts earlier, with first cut taken in the first week of May or end of April, weather-permitting.

 

Due to the fact grass is cut younger and leafier, silage quality has improved markedly (see table). Now, it is possible for all cuts to achieve 11ME or more and 15-16% crude protein. However, Mr Bayley is keen to highlight this is only possible when the weather is in your favour, and the nature
of farming means every year is different.


He adds: “Our first cut is not any better now, but it’s the subsequent cuts that have improved in quality. The aim is to make all of our cuts similar to our old first cut.”

 

Digestibility

 

The high silage digestibility means cows are able to eat more of it, with Mr Bayley notably surprised at how much forage cows will eat. In 2017, the herd achieved forage dry matter intakes of 15kg DM per head per day. This enabled forage replacers, like moist feed, to be knocked out of the diet.


However, this year forage intakes are back at pre-multicut levels due to depressed forage stocks following last year’s drought. This meant only four cuts could be taken. This highlights the need to cut good quantities of silage in order to meet increased forage dry matter intake demands.

 

Mr Bayley believes by cutting five lighter cuts, he is producing the same tonnage as he was on the three-cut system, but energy and protein is better.

 

Having lighter cuts means it is important to pay attention to wilt times. He explains: “You can get through the acreage quickly as there is less of it [yields]. But you need to spread it immediately after cutting so there’s a rapid wilt.”

 

He aims for a maximum wilt time of 24 hours to achieve 35% dry matter. Mr Bayley also believes using the proven additive MTD/1 is essential to make silage ‘that bit better’.

Lady Leys Farm – Improvements in silage quality and forage intakes
Lady Leys Farm – Improvements in silage quality and forage intakes

 


Multi-cut – key considerations

ONE: Fertiliser

Reduced cutting interval means special attention needs to be paid to crop nutrition to ensure all nitrogen is absorbed before harvesting. This will prevent effluent issues in the clamp.

  • Apply slurry into the soil immediately fields are cleared.
  • Apply bagged fertiliser as recommended by an agronomist but not more than two units/acre for each growing day between cuts.

TWO: Dry matter

As with traditional silage-making, the aim is to wilt rapidly to achieve 28-32% dry matter. Be aware that this can be achieved much quicker on a multi-cut system as the crop is lighter.

 

Some farmers, particularly Dutch producers who commonly adopt multi-cut, take the crop a lot drier to about 40%. However, to do this, clamps need to be narrow enough to move across the face quickly to help reduce aerobic losses. Mr Ward advises going as high as is practically possible.

 

THREE: Chop length

As grass is young and leafy, fibre levels are lower. With a short chop, this can cause slippage in the clamp. At 28-32% DM, Mr Ward advises a chop length of 5cm versus 2-3cm on traditional systems. Clamps should also be filled in thin layers of up to six inches each to prevent slippage.

 

FOUR: Additives

As crops are younger, sugar levels are naturally lower. These sugars are essential to achieve a good fermentation. To ensure the sugars which are present are used for a healthy fermentation, rather than ‘feeding’ bad bacteria, a proven additive can help.

 

“We have found in younger, leafier silages, if we don’t put additives on, we don’t get the correct fermentation,” explains Mr Ward.

 

An additive also helps preserve the high protein levels in the crop and prevent them from being broken down in to ammonia.

 

Treating silage with MTD/1 (the beneficial bacterial strain in Ecosyl) additive has been found to increase the level of ‘true protein’’ in the silage by 31%, compared to untreated silage. This true protein is what is used most efficiently by the animal for meat and milk production.

 

Mr Ward also advises choosing a proven additive that can be applied at low volume (20ml/t versus 2 litres/t). As multi-cut is cut faster, with a shorter window, a lower volume helps efficiencies in the field.

 

 

FIVE: Ration balance

Fibre levels are a lot lower on multi-cut silage, while quality is higher. This means additional fibre will need to be added to the diet to ensure the cow is able to utilise the forage effectively. Straw or long-chop haylage could be considered.

Silage-making strategies compared

Traditional

  • Two-three cuts taken a year on average
  • Six- to eight-week gap between cuts
  • First cut taken mid-May (on average – depending on location)
  • Generally cut at 50% ear emergence – when quality has started to decline
  • Tends to be compromise between quality and quantity (some focus more on quantity)

Multi-cut

  • More than three cuts taken a year (up to six)
  • About a four-week gap between cuts
  • First cut taken end of April
  • Cut earlier when quality is highest and grass is young and leafy
  • Individual cuts will be lighter but total yields across the year will be the same or more than the traditional method

Silage additive return on investment

MTD/1 is the strain of beneficial bacteria in Ecosyl silage additives. Compared with using no additive, treating with MTD/1 has been shown to give improvements in three ways:

ONE: Improved grass quantity

  • Across 15 grass silage trials, dry matter recovery with MTD/1 was boosted from 91.8% to 95.5% of the original material ensiled
  • If 1,000 tonnes of fresh weight (FW) were originally clamped at 30% DM, that would equate to an
    extra 37t FW back
  • If silage is worth £30/t, that is an extra £1,110 return

TWO: Improved silage quality

In addition, across various trials, treating with MTD/1 has been shown to:

  • Improve silage metabolisable energy by an average of 0.7 MJ/kgDM
  • Improve silage digestibility by an average of 3 D units

THREE: Improved milk yield

  • MTD/1-treated silage has also been shown to improve milk yield by an average of an extra 1.2 litres per cow per day (15 trials, various forages)
  • Assuming 200 days of feeding silage, that extra 1.2 litres of milk per cow per day equates to an extra 240 litres of milk per cow
  • Assuming a cow eats 10t of silage, the cost of additive for those 10t would be about £13
  • In other words, a £62 return for a £13 investment (assuming 26ppl for milk)

Grassland Toolkit 2019

Grassland Toolkit 2019

Your essential guide to grassland and grass silage management.

 

Find out more


Get involved with #GrasslandToolkit

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS