Farmers Guradian
Topics
Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Arable Farming Magazine

Arable Farming Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

CropTec

LAMMA 2018

New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
Login or Register
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days
Already a Member?

Login | Join us now

Beef processor movement limit prompts frustration at marts

Dunbia has reportedly joined other processors enforcing penalties on cattle moved more than three times


Twitter Facebook
Twitter Facebook
Auction marts chiefs said penalties on cattle movements were introduced without justification
Auction marts chiefs said penalties on cattle movements were introduced without justification

Auction mart chiefs have warned of confusion in the industry following Dunbia’s enforcement of penalties for more than three cattle movements.

 

The processor has reportedly introduced a 15p/kg penalty for cattle moved more than three times during their lifetime. Farmers Guardian understands ABP and St Merryn already operate such penalties.

 

But parts of the industry have said processors need to define what a cattle movement is so auction marts can display this information to buyers.

 

While the penalty has reportedly been introduced to improve traceability of beef products and clamp down on the action of some cattle dealer, the National Beef Association (NBA) said there was ’no justification’ for the move.

 

Chris Mallon, national director, said: "I do not believe the housewife is looking at meat and saying ’how many moves has this animal made?’

 

"It is up to £75 [per animal] for no reason at all. The processors are giving that many stipulations it becomes impossible to do the job properly."

 

Chris Dodds, executive secretary at the Livestock Auctioneers Association (LAA), underlined these views, claiming the penalty had been introduced with ’no science and no justification’.

 

He raised questions over whether the penalty related to a specific number of owners, residencies or had another potential definition.

 

"If we do not get clarity over it the store men cannot find out whether an animal is suitable for their job," he said. "We cannot announce the number of moves [an animal has made] until we know what a move constitutes."

 

He added some of the large UK abattoirs were Irish-owned and Ireland had a database showing auctioneers the amount of movement cattle had made, while UK did not have this.

 

Charles Sercombe, national livestock board chairman at the NFU, said the union sympathised with auctioneers and suggested the issue highlighted the need for a better cattle database for the industry.

 

Dunbia has also reportedly introduced penalties for animals over 400kg and Mr Sercombe said this was causing farmer frustration.

 

Adam Quinney, a beef finisher from Redditch, Worcestershire, said the quick introduction of the three movements penalty showed Dunbia had not signed up to the voluntary code. He suggested the introduction of the penalty needed to be applied sensibly for animals only moving on monetary grounds.


Read More

Dunbia could be set for sale as it looks to continue growth Dunbia could be set for sale as it looks to continue growth
Dunbia profits up 40 per cent as new facilities aid growth Dunbia profits up 40 per cent as new facilities aid growth
Good supplies could prompt difficult 2016 for beef markets Good supplies could prompt difficult 2016 for beef markets
Lamb gets seasonal boost while beef fails to benefit from Christmas trade Lamb gets seasonal boost while beef fails to benefit from Christmas trade
Longtown and Dumfries marts sold by administrators Longtown and Dumfries marts sold by administrators

Twitter Facebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS