Farmers Guardian
Topics
How to spot BSE and what farmers can do to prevent it

How to spot BSE and what farmers can do to prevent it

DataHub

DataHub

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Auction Finder

Auction Finder

CropTec

CropTec

LAMMA 2020

LAMMA 2020

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days or subscribe for unlimited access.

Subscribe | Register

Beef special: Benefits of feeding beef calves higher planes of nutrition

Feeding beef calves on higher rates of milk replacer is known to improve weight gain in the pre-weaning period, but new results show benefits right through to slaughter on an intensive system.

TwitterFacebook
Share This

Beef special: Benefits of feeding beef calves higher planes of nutrition

In the studies at Harper Adams University, calves fed on higher rates of milk replacer as pre-weaned calves performed better with higher daily weight gains through to slaughter than calves initially fed lower rates of milk replacer.

 

Calculations also suggest the increased carcase value covered any increase in feed costs. Simon Marsh, principal lecturer and beef specialist at Harper Adams, who oversaw the study, says: “There has been considerable interest in feeding elevated levels of milk replacer to dairy replacements.

 

Objective

 

“The objective of our studies was to examine if there were similar benefits in artificially fed beef calves. While it is generally now recognised by livestock rearers that continental bull calves should be fed 750g/day on milk replacer, can this be increased further?”

 

Mr Marsh explains that in the study, 34 British Blue cross Holstein calves had been reared on either 750g/day or 900g/day of milk replacer. Both groups were fed ad-lib early weaning concentrates.

 

Milk feed rates were gradually reduced through to weaning at 42 days.

 

At weaning, calves fed on the elevated rate of milk replacer had averaged 0.91kg/day daily liveweight gain (DLWG) compared to 0.73kg/day achieved by calves on the lower rate.

 

At 12 weeks they had gained 5.6kg more and scored higher on wither height, hip height and last rib girth, showing they were bigger framed.


Read More

Beef special: Centenary year for British WhitesBeef special: Centenary year for British Whites
Beef special: Focusing on fertility can boost your bottom lineBeef special: Focusing on fertility can boost your bottom line
Beef Special: Networking provides knowledge for novel management methodsBeef Special: Networking provides knowledge for novel management methods
Beef special: Suckler switch is harnessing technologyBeef special: Suckler switch is harnessing technology

“Concentrate intakes were the same between the groups, although we expected calves fed higher rates of replacer would eat less concentrates,” Mr Marsh says.

 

“This led to feed costs being 5p/kg gain higher on the elevated feed rates, but the number of calves requiring medical treatments was significantly lower.

 

“When we added the costs of morbidity to the feed costs, the cost per kilo of liveweight gain was lower for calves fed higher rates of milk replacer.”

 

Performance

 

The question then remained about whether having larger, healthier, better-framed calves at weaning would translate into higher valued animals at slaughter.

 

The calves were then taken through to slaughter on an intensive cereal beef system and their performance monitored.

 

“From 12 weeks old, the cattle were fed a barley-based 14 per cent crude protein, 37 per cent starch concentrate ad-lib with straw available ad-lib as well,” Mr Marsh says.

“Cattle were selected for slaughter at a target fat class of 3.

 

“The calves fed on 900g of milk replacer recorded significantly higher daily gains and were slaughtered 16 days sooner. Carcase weights were also 7.7kg heavier.”

 

Mr Marsh says bulls fed on the higher level of milk replacer recorded slightly lower fat classifications and could possibly have been slaughtered older at a similar age to the bulls fed on the lower rate of milk replacer.

 

This would have meant they would have achieved significantly heavier carcase weights.

 

“When we look at the financial impact, calves fed 900g milk replacer recorded an extra £33 carcase value, easily recovering the £13 extra pre-weaning feed costs,” he says.

 

“In addition, as they were slaughtered 16 days earlier, they would have consumed around 150kg less concentrates, increasing margins by a further £30 per bull.”

TwitterFacebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.

Most Recent

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS