You are viewing 1 of your 2 free articles

You’ll need to join us by becoming a member to gain more access.
Already a Member?

Login Join us now

‘Patronising’ study claims farmers can cut pesticides without losses

Don't Miss

The NFU has hit back after a new study carried out in France claimed farmers can dramatically cut pesticide use while maintaining the same levels of production and profitability.

Twitter Facebook
Share This

‘Patronising’ study claims farmers can cut pesticides without losses

According to the research, total pesticide use could be slashed by 42 per cent without any negative effects on profits or yields on 59 per cent of the 946 farms included in the study.


The scientists say their findings are ‘consistent’ with the recent UN report which branded pesticides a ‘global human rights concern’ and said they were not needed to feed the world.


They also claim farmers want to reduce pesticide use, but are unable to because they are reliant upon agrochemical companies for advice.


Seldom acknowledged


NFU vice president Guy Smith said: “Official figures show UK farmers have significantly reduced pesticide use in the last twenty-five years and maintained production, but this seldom seems acknowledged.


“Most farmers I know are always looking to use less inputs while not compromising yield. It makes good business sense.


“But I suspect many farmers will feel a little patronised by this report which lacks solid science and infers farmers are being duped into over-use of crop protection materials.”


Nicolas Munier-Jolain, one of the researchers who conducted the study, told The Guardian farmers who used low levels of chemicals also employed other methods to control pests such as rotating crops, mechanical weeding, using resistant varieties and carefully managing sowing dates.




Mr Smith said it was ‘ridiculous’ to suggest farmers were unaware of non-chemical solutions, but they should not be ‘naively promoted’ without understanding the costs involved due to lower production.


“Going forward, I am sure farmers will always seek solutions which go beyond the chemical can, but at the same time they are not going to rush into alternatives which simply are not thought through”, he added.


Crop Protection Association chief executive Sarah Mukherjee told Farmers Guardian the research showed farmers growing sugar beet, potatoes and oil seed rape would lose out without pesticides.


“Crop protection products are expensive, and farmers in the UK use them only when absolutely necessary as part of an integrated approach to pest management”, she said.

Twitter Facebook
Rating (0 vote/s)
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.

More News

Scottish farm incomes halved in one year

NFU Scotland said the figures showed the system was not working for farmers

New blight website launched

AHDB Potatoes has launched a new website to help combat the industry’s most threatening disease.

Cold temperatures and lack of moisture create weed control dilemma

A sharp drop in temperatures across the UK, along with a lack of moisture in some regions, has left growers facing a weed control headache.

BYDV threat to spring barley

With the risk of Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus (BYDV) in winter cereals nearly over, attention turns to spring cereals and the warm start to 2017 has encouraged early migration of aphids, especially in the North and West.

Growers urged not to panic during frosts and freezing temperatures

A switch to freezing temperatures has come as a worry to growers and agronomists.
FG Insight and FGInsight.com are trademarks of Briefing Media Ltd.
Farmers Guardian and FarmersGuardian.com are trademarks of Farmers Guardian Ltd, a subsidiary of Briefing Media Ltd.
All material published on FGInsight.com and FarmersGuardian.com is copyrighted © 2016 by Briefing Media Limited. All rights reserved.
RSS news feeds