Farmers Guradian
Topics
Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Arable Farming Magazine

Arable Farming Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

LAMMA 2018

New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
Login or Register
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days
Already a Member?

Login | Join us now

EU poised to ban crop protection products on human health grounds

A range of crop protection products used by farmers are set to be withdrawn from sale because of new EU rules on endocrine disruptors.



Twitter Facebook
Twitter Facebook
Share This

EU poised to ban crop protection products on human health grounds #EndocrineDisruptors

Endocrine disruptors are chemicals found in crop protection products, plastics and cosmetics. They can interfere with hormone systems at certain doses.

 

Environmental groups claim they pose a risk to human health and there has been a long-running battle to regulate their use.

 

On Tuesday, a majority of experts from the 28 member states approved the European Commission’s proposed definition of the chemicals, which will allow the EU to ban a number of crop protection products without taking into account potency – how much of a chemical is required to generate a negative effect.

 

The UK voted against the proposal.

 

Lost

 

61 active substances are at risk of being lost, with the largest potential impact falling on triazole fungicides. Herbicides and insecticides are also affected.

 

EU Commissioner for health and food safety Vytenis Andriukaitis said the vote was a ‘great success’.

 

“After months of discussion, we are advancing in the direction of the first regulatory system in the world with legally binding criteria to define what an endocrine disruptor is”, he added.

 

“Once implemented, the text will ensure any active substance used in pesticides which is identified as an endocrine disruptor for people or animals can be assessed and withdrawn from the market.”

 

But NFU senior regulatory affairs adviser Chris Hartfield said the EU had chosen to push forward with the most hazard-based and precautionary of all the options on the table.

 

Impact

 

“This option does not deliver any greater protection for citizens, but clearly it has much greater impact in terms of the number of actives which could potentially be lost”, he added.

 

“This is going to further undermine farmers’ ability to be competitive and leave them with fewer options to tackle pests and diseases.”

 

Crop Protection Association chief executive Sarah Mukherjee agreed. She said: “This is an incredibly disappointing outcome.

 

“These criteria mean products will be removed from use without any demonstrable benefit to the protection of human health or the environment.”

 

A separate discussion on an exception to the ban which would allow chemicals to be used if there was ‘negligible exposure’ to them has been pushed back to the end of the year.


Read More

‘Nuanced view’ needed on endocrine disruptors ‘Nuanced view’ needed on endocrine disruptors
EFSA concludes glyphosate does not interfere with human hormone systems EFSA concludes glyphosate does not interfere with human hormone systems
EU definition of endocrine disruptors brings wave of uncertainty for growers EU definition of endocrine disruptors brings wave of uncertainty for growers
Fight over endocrine disruptors continues Fight over endocrine disruptors continues
Future of crop protection in doubt as MEPs reject endocrine disruptor definition Future of crop protection in doubt as MEPs reject endocrine disruptor definition

Twitter Facebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS