Farmers Guradian
Topics
Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Arable Farming Magazine

Arable Farming Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

British Farming Awards

CropTec

LAMMA 2018

New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
Login or Register
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days
Already a Member?

Login | Join us now

EU policymakers accused of 'disregarding the science' as key pesticides under threat

UK politicians and industry leaders have called on EU policymakers to adopt a science-based approach as efforts to restrict the use of glyphosate and neonicotinoids are stepped up.
MEPs have rejected proposals to re-licence Glyphosate
MEPs have rejected proposals to re-licence Glyphosate

EU policymakers have been accused of ‘disregarding the evidence and science’ as the future of vital crop protection products hangs in the balance.

 

The European Parliament’s Environment Committee voted overwhelmingly last week to reject European Commission proposals to renew the licence for glyphosate for another 15 years, at least until the European Commission has carried out an independent review into its safety.

 

Separately, the French National Assembly recently voted to ban the use of all neonicotinoid insecticides from September 1, 2018.

 

The French Government said the ban was ‘a responsible solution that provides the necessary time to assess alternatives’. French Agriculture Minister, Stéphane Le Foll has called on Brussels to ensure these restrictions applied across the EU.

 

Neither decision is binding.

 

The full EU Parliament and the European Commission will have their say on glyphosate over the next two months.

 

Some experts predicting, if Monsanto’s flagship product is eventually approved, restrictions could be placed on its use, such as banning it for desiccation (application just before harvest).

 

A final vote on the French neonicotinoid decision is expected in the summer.

Intense scrutiny

But, at a time when the UK’s relationship with the EU is under intense scrutiny, the votes have once again put the spotlight on the EU regulatory process.

 

The MEPs’ concern about glyphosate stems from a report by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) last year which concluded glyphosate was ’probably carcinogenic to humans’.

 

But the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has subsequently concluded glyphosate was ‘unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans’, while other studies have endorsed its safety.

 


Read More

Crack down on fake pesticides to protect health and environment, says ECPA Crack down on fake pesticides to protect health and environment, says ECPA
Diamondback moth influx set to devastate brassica crops Diamondback moth influx set to devastate brassica crops
Ground-breaking biochemical control agents trialled in Wales Ground-breaking biochemical control agents trialled in Wales
MEPs call for ‘low risk’ biological pesticides to be fast-tracked for approval in the EU MEPs call for ‘low risk’ biological pesticides to be fast-tracked for approval in the EU

ge

Farming Minister George Eustice, who is campaigning to leave the EU, cited a recent ’comprehensive scientific study by German authorities’ which concluded that glyphosate was safe to use.

 

“So a ban is not justified by the science,” he said. “While I am hopeful that there will be a change of heart, this is the latest example of the EU disregarding evidence and science when it comes to pesticide authorisations.”

 

He said a vote to leave the EU would enable the EU to put in place a ‘credible authorisation procedure for both pesticides and genetic technologies rooted in science rather than the politics of the EU’.

 

UKIP MEP Stuart Agnew has also suggested the EU Parliament vote strengthens the argument for Brexit.

 

He said the voted, which he said should have been the responsibility of the agriculture committee, was forced through ’on a wave of emotion’ by a combination of ’socialists, the far left or communists, the liberals and the genuine greens’.

 

"Even the EU Commission couldn’t find anything wrong with glyphosate," he said. "It has still got to go through the full (EU Parliament) plenary and the Commission but my guess is they will ban glyphosate as a desiccant but allow it pre-emergent."

Safety record

gs

NFU vice president Guy Smith said glyphosate had a ‘long and well established safety record’, as endorsed recently by EFSA.

 

He said: “Its loss would have a huge negative impact on the competitive ability of European farmers.

 

"It enables British farmers to produce wholesome crops as well as tackle problem weeds such as Blackgrass and allows for environmentally benign practices such as min till.

 

"At a time when the way the EU regulates is under the microscope, EU politicians would do well not to play fast and loose with a key part of the farmers crop production tool box.”

 

Crop Protection Association chief executive Nick von Westenholz warned farmers were ‘at a grave risk of losing more important products without good, scientific reason’.


He said: "I’m afraid it’s more evidence of the anti-innovation approach we’re increasingly seeing amongst European policy-makers."

 

He called on policy-makers, whatever the outcome of the EU referendum, to ‘return to science-based decision making’.

Effective pesticides

A Defra spokesperson said: “We recognise the importance of effective pesticides to farmers and we remain entirely committed to making them available where the regulators are satisfied and scientific evidence shows they do not pose unacceptable risks to human health or the environment.

 

"The EU Commission are already carrying out a review of the science relating to the impact of neonicotinoids on bees and we are contributing fully.


"The European Food Safety Authority did not find that glyphosate posed a risk to human health and UK experts agree, however we await the decision by the European Commission on the renewal of its approval.”

What the companies behind the glyphosate application say

The Glyphosate Task Force, a consortium of companies jointly seeking renew the European glyphosate registration, acknowledged 'that a degree of concern regarding the use of plant protection products is evident among the public.'

 

But it said: "However, the taskforce maintains that this resolution contains statements which are not based on scientific evidence and ignores the conclusions of extensive and thorough evaluations which have been conducted by both EFSA and the BfR."

 

It said the European Commission has recommended that glyphosate is renewed for approval in the EU based on the weight of extensive scientific evidence which has concluded that the substance poses no unacceptable risk to human health or to the environment.

What next for glyphosate?

  • Glyphosate was introduced to the consumer market in 1974 as a broad-spectrum herbicide and quickly became a best seller and flagship product for Monsant
  • Since its patent expired in 2000, it has been marketed by various companies and several hundred plant protection products containing glyphosate are currently registered in Europe for use on crops
  • Glyphosate is currently undergoing a re-approval procedure
  • The European Commission, following advice from the European Food Safety Authority, had proposed to renew glyphosate’s approval on the EU market until 2031
  • But last week, the European Parliament’s Environment Committee passed a resolution by 38 votes to six, with 18 abstentions, calling on the EU not to renew glyphosate’s authorisation ‘without restrictions as proposed’
  • Instead, it has called on Europe to commission an independent review and disclose all the scientific evidence EFSA used to assess glyphosate
  • The committee calls on the Commission to table a new draft implementing regulation for consideration by member states
  • The full EU Parliament vote on the committee’s recommendation at the April 11-14 plenary session in Strasbourg
  • National experts on the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed will vote to adopt or reject the Commission proposal by qualified majority in May
  • If there is no such majority, it will be up to the European Commission to decide
  • If glyphosate is approved, there are likely to be attempts to restrict its use, for example, banning it for desiccation.

 

French neonicotinoid vote

  • The French National Assembly, the lower house of the country’s parliament, has voted to ban use of all neonicotinoid insecticides as of September 1, 2018.
  • The bill is still in draft form and is due to go back to the French Senate for further review before the Assembly takes a final vote on the matter, probably in the summer.
  • French farms minister, Stéphane Le Foll said France would call on the EU Commission to ensure these restrictions applied to the whole of the EU.
  • Certain neonicotinoids are currently suspended for use in flowering crops, such as oilseed rape, at EU level.
  • The EU is currently carrying out a review of the policy.
Twitter Facebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS