Farmers Guradian
Topics
Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Arable Farming Magazine

Arable Farming Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

CropTec

LAMMA 2018

New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
Login or Register
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days
Already a Member?

Login | Join us now

Lord Duncan: UK should have its own agricultural policy after Brexit

Scottish Office Minister Lord Ian Duncan has astonished the political world by suggesting the UK should have its own agriculture and fisheries policies from Brexit day in March 2019.

Share This

Lord Duncan: UK should have its own agricultural policy after Brexit

Speaking at NFU Scotland’s autumn conference at Birnam, he said the UK could walk away from the Common Agricultural Policy and the Common Fisheries Policy 17 months from now on the second anniversary of the triggering of Article 50.

 

These policies would therefore not be part of the two-year transition deal sought by the Prime Minister in her Florence speech.

 

Lord Duncan has apparently speaking with the approval of the Defra Secretary Michel Gove.

 

“We believe taking UK farming out of the CAP during transition is the right thing to do. As farmers you will be better off,” Lord Duncan told the NFUS members.


Read More

Brexit 'not to blame' for skills crisis in food and farming Brexit 'not to blame' for skills crisis in food and farming
Brexit will be 'game changer' for UK dairy industry Brexit will be 'game changer' for UK dairy industry
MPs call on Trade and Brexit Ministers to explain how they will protect farming MPs call on Trade and Brexit Ministers to explain how they will protect farming
UK human consumption grade bean availability about 'half of last year' UK human consumption grade bean availability about 'half of last year'
Use Brexit as opportunity to ban live exports, say MPs Use Brexit as opportunity to ban live exports, say MPs

He added: “You will get your money.

 

“Remember we have guaranteed Single Farm Payment and Less Favoured Area support until the end of this parliament in 2022.”

 

The news however completely astonished not only the NFUS leadership but also Scottish Government Brexit Minister Mike Russell who was sharing the platform with Lord Duncan when he dropped his ‘no transition’ bombshell.

 

Mr Russell said: “This is not what we understand. We cannot be both in and out.

 

“Ian Duncan has just contradicted the Prime Minister’s Florence speech. Taking fishing and agriculture out of the transition arrangements would be very difficult and add greatly to the confusion.

 

“It is impossible to now know what the UK Government’s position really is.”

 

NFUS President Andrew McCornick was equally taken aback. He said: “Are we really to be out of the EU and have a UK agricultural policy in place by March 2019?”

 

Lord Duncan, a former MEP, insisted this could well be the case and Brexit talks could be made easier by taking agriculture and fishing out of the equation.

 

“There is no such word as ‘transition’ in the EU lexicon. Everything can be negotiated,” he said.

He also hailed an early exit from the CAP as being a chance to reduce regulation while at the same time being free of the threat of ‘multi-million euro’ fines from the EU.

 

Mr Russell meanwhile warned of the risk of ‘unintended consequences’ if regulations were discarded without sufficient thought being put into the process.

WTO warnings

“If you think the CAP is complex you should have a look at the WTO,” Scotland’s Brexit Minister Mike Russell told the NFUS autumn conference.

 

He had recently attended talks at the World Trade Organisation’s headquarters in Switzerland and came away concerned about the organisation’s ability to object at will to any UK/EU trader deals.

 

“There are 160 members in the WTO and any of them can object to schedules which have been tabled,” he said.

 

“In the EU the Commission and the Council of Minsters can help resolve disputes but there is no such mechanism in the WTO with a decisions made only at the end of what can be very lengthy tribunal process.”

 

Labour

If there was any agreement to be found between Ian Duncan and Mike Russell it was over the importance of migrant labour to Scottish agriculture and the food sector.

 

Lord Duncan said: “A Seasonal Agricultural Workers Scheme (SAWS) is absolutely required.

“Most countries in the world have visa schemes and I know that there will need to be a scheme here that allows people to come and work.”

 

Mr Russell said: “There needs to be a [Brexit] outcome that allows for freedom of movement. This is especially the case in Scotland. If we lose even a proportion of our EU migrants we will be in serious trouble.”

 

NFUS president Andrew McCornick had already said trade, labour and agricultural policy were the three key areas which had to be resolved.

 

“Of these labour is the low-hanging fruit and the issue which can be resolved quickest,” he added.

Questions

Lord Ian Duncan’s suggestion that the UK could have its own agricultural policy in place only 17 months from now was greeted with amazement. Once the news had been digested the questions began to arise.

  • Would it really be possible to devise a new UK policy in such a short time without simply copying and pasting the existing CAP into domestic legislation?”
  • Where does this leave Mrs May’s offer to pay 20 euros into EU coffers during a two year transition period?” Will she now reduce this by the 6bn euros annually which would have come back to the UK to fund agricultural support?
  • Lord Duncan’s proposal is based in the assumption that farm support is guaranteed to match present EU levels until the ‘end of this parliament in 2022’, but what happens if there is an election much sooner?
  • If the two-year transition talks end with an agreement to have close relationship with the EU will where will that leave an isolated British Agricultural Policy with different regulatory requirements? This could have a bearing on future non-tariff or low tariff trade deals.
  • Or is this an opportunity to put agriculture and food in the vanguard of Brexit despite the risks?

So many questions, so few answers!

Twitter Facebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS