Farmers Guradian
Topics
Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Arable Farming Magazine

Arable Farming Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

British Farming Awards

CropTec

LAMMA 2019

New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
Login or Register
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days
Already a Member?

Login | Join us now

Natural England announces improvements to CSS as farmers brand scheme a 'disaster'

Natural England has announced improvements to the Countryside Stewardship Scheme, including new grants for hedgerows and boundaries. It came as the NFU council made its feelings known about the £3.1bn scheme’s failings.
The NFU fears a mass exodus from agri-environment schemes
The NFU fears a mass exodus from agri-environment schemes

Natural England has announced a number changes to the Countryside Stewardship Scheme intended as it was branded an ‘unmitigated disaster’ by NFU council members.

 

The agency’s chief operating officer Guy Thompson and Defra deputy director Mike Rowe were honest about the scheme’s failings when they addressed the council on Tuesday (January 19).

 

Mr Rowe said CSS, which has been vigorously defended by farming Minister George Eustice, had been a ‘casualty’ of Defra’s focus on the Basic Payment Scheme, which had been the Department’s ‘political priority’ in 2015.

Mr Thompson admitted the £3.1 billion scheme had endured a ‘wobbly start’.

 

He maintained the overall scheme design was ‘fit-for-purpose’, given the demands of the EU regulatory framework it had to fit within - he stressed many of the scheme requirements that farmers have found so unpalatable were imposed at EU level.

 

The scheme was designed to provide better-value-for-money for the taxpayer and it was always going to be ’more targeted’ on agreements that delivered maximum environmental benefit. Take-up was always going to lower than Environmental Stewardship.

 

But he acknowledged the way it had been implemented had not been fit-for purpose and had been, at times, ‘downright poor’. As a result the scheme had not attracted the numbers initially hoped for, he admitted.

 


Read More

Countryside Stewardship applications fall well short of expectations Countryside Stewardship applications fall well short of expectations
Countryside Stewardship on course to be a success - Eustice Countryside Stewardship on course to be a success - Eustice
Failure of Countryside Stewardship Scheme will hurt nature and wildlife - CLA Failure of Countryside Stewardship Scheme will hurt nature and wildlife - CLA
More broken promises on Countryside Stewardship More broken promises on Countryside Stewardship
NFU calls for changes to Countryside Stewardship after survey confirms member 'disillusionment' NFU calls for changes to Countryside Stewardship after survey confirms member 'disillusionment'

CSS facts and figures

  • About 11,000 Entry Level Stewardship (ELS) agreements expired last year.
  • But CSS attracted just 2,334 Mid-Tier applications in 2015, well short of the 6,000 or so Natural England and Defra had been hoping for.
  • 326 Higher Tier applications were submitted from 1,000 expressions of interest.
  • The number of new agreements has not yet been confirmed.
  • NE expects Mid and High Tier CSS agreements to support management of 18,000ha of priority habitat and planting of 1300 ha of woodland
  • 1375 Water Capital Grants worth £12 million were agreed.

Facilitation fund

  • 19 groups successfully applied for the Countryside Stewardship Facilitation Fund. They will invest £1.8 million in landscape scale conservation across 77,000 hectares in the next 5 years
  • The second round of the CS Facilitation Fund applications opened on Monday and closes on 18 March Guidance is available here.

Environmental Stewardship payments

  • Natural England paid all valid ES partial payments by December – worth £155 million – and is processing agreements that were not valid
  • It has also processed 57 per cent of second ES payments and is aiming is to have completed all payable claims by end of March.

With this in mind, Defra and Natural England have been working with industry representatives on improvements for 2016 and Mr Thompson outlined changes agreed so far.

 

These include a longer application period, clearer and earlier guidance, an online options tool and new hedgerow and boundary grants.

 

He said: “I am not expecting 2016 to be perfect but I can promise improvements year on year.”

 

CSS improvements

Guidance

 

'Enhanced' guidance will be issued earlier and is being reviewed to ensure it is 'as clear and as farmer friendly as possible'.

 

Overly-complex guidance extending to 800 pages was one of the biggest criticisms of the scheme in 2015.


Online options tool

 

In 2016 there will be an options selection tool for the Mid-Tier scheme available through the Rural Payments service.

 

It will allow farmers to look at what options score most highly on their holding to help prepare their application.

 

Application windows

 

The intention is to open the 'whole scheme for business' on March 1.

 

This was a response that the summer application window, clashing with harvest, did not give farmers enough to prepare proper applications.


Hedgerow and Boundaries grants

 

Opening for applications from early February until April 30, these new grants, worth up to £5,000 - and £5 million a year in total - will be available for works on boundaries and hedgerows for wildlife or landscape.

 

The work can be completed flexibly over two years and must be maintained for five.

 

The grants will be available only for people who are not in multi-annual CSS, Environmental Stewardship and Woodland Grant schemes. But applicants can apply for CSS agreements starting in 2017.

 

The work addresses another big complaint about CSS - the lack of field boundary options that were the cornerstone of many Environmental Stewardship agreements.

 

Farmer criticism

But farmers demanded further fundamental change in order to restore fragile confidence in CSS and avert a mass exodus from agri-environment schemes.

 

NFU council members heaped criticism on various aspects of the scheme, including its overall complexity manifested in the 800 pages of guidance, the timing and administration of the application process, burdensome requirements, including excessive record-keeping and the lack of relevant options, particularly for grassland farmers.

 

Farmers also complained about delay ES payments, while NFU vice president Guy Smith asked for clear figures on the number of agreements offered and accepted so far.

 

One of the few council members who had applied for CSS, Ian Waller, from Buckinghamshire described the situation as ‘diabolical’.

 

“To say it has been a traumatic roller coaster has been a major understatement in my case.”

 

Even his own Natural England adviser of five years could not grasp the scheme rules, while farming colleagues who previously had ‘good ELS options’ were ‘running a mile’ from CSS.

 

Cornwall farmer Martin Howlett said ‘27 years of success will be thrown out of the window unless we stop penalising the environmental champions’, something former EU Agriculture Commissioner Dacian Ciolos had pledged would not happen.

Absolute disgrace

Lancashire farmer Thomas Binns said the scheme was an ‘absolute disgrace’ and highlighted farmer ‘mistrust’ in it, particularly regarding the burdensome record-keeping requirements.

 

pic

NFU uplands chairman Robin Milton described it as an ‘unmitigated disaster’, with grassland ‘largely abandoned’ and hill farmers ‘actively excluded from the available options’.

 

Many feared it would actually cost them money to join the scheme, he said.

 

He warned, unless the 800 pages of online guidance, which was ‘bloody impossible’ for farmers to access, was simplified, the scheme would effectively be ‘handed over to the agents’.

 

“You are going to have to address the lack of confidence you have now caused in agri-environment,” he told the Government officials.

 

After the meeting, Mr Smith said: “It’s no surprise that the uptake of Countryside Stewardship has dropped off so significantly with the poor launch that it’s had.

 

"What they need to focus on now is improving the scheme. And we, as the NFU, are committed to keeping the pressure on them to make sure this happens."

 

Mr Smith outlined the NFU’s priorities:

 

  • Guidance needs to be written for farmers.
  • There is too much guidance (over 800 pages) and too much bureaucracy. It’s far too easy to get the record keeping wrong resulting in draconian penalties. We want a pragmatic approach to record keeping.
  • Countryside Stewardship needs to work alongside farming systems.
  • Members need to have confidence they can enter the scheme without risk of big penalties. They need to be able to trust Government to work with farmers to deliver Countryside Stewardship.”

 

Twitter Facebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS