Farmers Guradian
Topics
Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

DataHub

DataHub

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Auction Finder

Auction Finder

British Farming Awards

British Farming Awards

CropTec

CropTec

LAMMA 2019

LAMMA 2019

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days or subscribe for unlimited access.

Subscribe | Register

IARC deleted evidence showing glyphosate non-carcinogenic in its safety assessment

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)’s conclusion that glyphosate is carcinogenic has been called into question after it emerged findings proving the chemical’s safety had been removed from its final report.


Abi   Kay

TwitterFacebook
Abi   Kay
TwitterFacebook
Share This

IARC deleted evidence showing #glyphosate non-carcinogenic in its safety assessment

In a draft version of the assessment seen by Reuters, several references were made to researchers’ conclusions which stated glyphosate was not carcinogenic and did not cause tumours.

 

But in the final version of the report, these remarks had been deleted or replaced with comments about ‘limited experimental data’.

 

Further concerns were raised about the validity of IARC’s conclusion – the only body in the world to declare glyphosate a probable carcinogen – by the revelation that a scientist who advised the body received more than £120,000 from law firms representing clients who claimed the chemical had given them cancer.

 

Safe

 

Crop Protection Association chief executive Sarah Mukherjee said: “Glyphosate is, and always has been safe.

 

“The debate has never really been about safety, it has been hijacked and politicised to force a wider debate on modern agriculture. It is right we are having this debate, but it is wrong to use health scares to get there.

 

“These revelations cast even further doubt over the process involved in IARC reaching their classification of glyphosate as being ‘probably carcinogenic to humans’.

 

“The crop protection industry is committed to participating in the public discourse around our products in a spirit of openness and transparency.

 

Unfortunate

 

“It is unfortunate that some of the activists ideologically opposed to modern agriculture do not share this commitment.”

 

IARC did not respond to Reuters’ questions about the alterations, saying only the draft assessment was ‘confidential’ and ‘deliberative in nature’.

 

The wrangling over IARC’s report came as MEPs on the European Environment Committee voted for glyphosate to be banned by December 15 2020.

 

Under the plans, which will be voted on by all MEPs next week, a complete ban on household use would come first, with a ban on farming use to follow.


Read More

EFSA concludes glyphosate does not interfere with human hormone systems EFSA concludes glyphosate does not interfere with human hormone systems
European Commission recommends 5-year glyphosate licence renewal European Commission recommends 5-year glyphosate licence renewal
French farmers livid as France seeks to block glyphosate renewal French farmers livid as France seeks to block glyphosate renewal
Glyphosate ban would cost British farmers almost £1billion a year Glyphosate ban would cost British farmers almost £1billion a year
Glyphosate decision to go to appeal after five-year licence proposal fails Glyphosate decision to go to appeal after five-year licence proposal fails

TwitterFacebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.

Most Recent

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS