ao link
Farmers Guardian
News
Over The Farm Gate

Over The Farm Gate

This Is Agriculture - Sponsored

This Is Agriculture - Sponsored

DataHub

DataHub

Auction Finder

Auction Finder

LAMMA 2021

LAMMA 2021

Michael Gove's embrace of gene editing prompts 'Frankencow' backlash

NFU chief livestock advisor John Royle urged caution over livestock gene editing over concerns it was not acceptable to consumers.

TwitterFacebook
Share This

Gove's embrace of gene editing prompts 'Frankencow' backlash

The NFU has expressed concern about Defra Secretary Michael Gove’s embrace of gene editing technology, which he claimed could help livestock farmers remove vulnerabilities to illness and develop more valuable animals.

 

In his speech at Oxford Farming Conference, Mr Gove welcomed the technological advances in this area, suggesting they offered the possibility of ‘conquering’ human and animal diseases.


Read More

Legal push for UK to break away from restrictive EU rules on gene editingLegal push for UK to break away from restrictive EU rules on gene editing
Gene editing supported by almost three-quarters of the public, shows new researchGene editing supported by almost three-quarters of the public, shows new research
EU Ministers consider updating GM regs after ECJ ruling on gene editingEU Ministers consider updating GM regs after ECJ ruling on gene editing
Soil Association slams Eustice’s claim gene-editing needed to cut pesticide useSoil Association slams Eustice’s claim gene-editing needed to cut pesticide use
Chequers will not stop UK embracing gene editing tech, says EusticeChequers will not stop UK embracing gene editing tech, says Eustice

But NFU chief livestock advisor John Royle was nervous of consumer reaction to genetically edited meat.

 

Mr Gove’s speech has already prompted criticism from campaigners, with the Daily Mail reporting it could lead to ‘Frankencows’.

 

Mr Royle said: “I am not so sure it is commercially viable. I think we have got to be mindful about consumer perceptions. People want higher welfare, good health and animals which have lived a good life.

 

“It has got this connotation animals live in a less natural way.”

 

Credentials

 

He added the industry needed to demonstrate its environmental, high welfare and health credentials to the public.

 

The backlash to Mr Gove’s speech continued with campaign group GM Watch accusing him of ‘disingenuously’ mixing medical applications of genome editing for curing diseases with editing of animals.

 

In a statement, the group claimed medical uses were largely non-contentious and could progress entirely independently of food crop and animal research.

 

The statement continued: “But genome editing of animals and food crops is wildly unpopular and entails the risk of producing off-target effects which pass undetected to consumers.”

 

Conventional techniques

 

Instead of focusing on gene editing, Mr Royle suggested farmers exploit more conventional techniques, alongside practices such as genomic mapping, to breed the best animals for meat and dairy.

 

He said: “We can still use this effectively to make sure we use the right bulls on the right cows.”

FG subs FINAL 2017

TwitterFacebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.

Most Recent

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS