Farmers Guradian
Topics
Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

DataHub

DataHub

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Auction Finder

Auction Finder

British Farming Awards

British Farming Awards

CropTec

CropTec

LAMMA 2019

LAMMA 2019

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days or subscribe for unlimited access.

Subscribe | Register

‘People should not mislead farmers’ – FUW reminds politicians farmers cannot be paid to deliver environmental benefits

The Farmers’ Union of Wales has used its election manifesto to remind politicians not to ‘mislead’ farmers about the possibility of them being paid for delivering environmental benefits after Brexit.


Abi   Kay

TwitterFacebook
Abi   Kay
TwitterFacebook
Share This

FUW calls on politicians not to mislead farmers over environment payments #GE2017

Farming Minister George Eustice has repeatedly told MPs he wants to move away from subsidy and use the money spent on direct payments to incentivise farmers to deliver public goods, but World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules only allow for compensation in this area.

 

The WTO forbids agri-environment schemes from directly providing income for farmers. They can only be paid for the extra costs or loss of income involved in complying with Government programmes.

 

Any net financial benefits for farmers participating in these schemes should, under the rules, be inadvertent.

 

Principle

 

FUW head of policy Nick Fenwick said: “The principle of paying farmers for delivering environmental benefits is something few would argue against.

 

“During the last CAP negotiations we had numerous discussions with EU officials and politicians about ways to do this without contravening WTO rules, but those rules are very black and white.

 

“As we prepare to replace the EU’s CAP, we need to look at all possible options, including novel ways of implementing agri-environmental schemes which are WTO-compliant.

 

Delude

 

“However, people should not delude themselves or mislead farmers and the general public about what is and is not possible. Repeating the mantra of wanting to pay farmers for delivering environmental goods will not change the WTO rules.”

 

Mr Fenwick called on a future UK Government to undertake detailed modelling of any proposals in this area.

 

He claimed serious damage could be inflicted on the rural economy if billions of pounds which are currently used to sustain businesses were moved to a budget which could only be used to pay expenses incurred following environmental work.

 

“Unless some incredibly creative options are offered, and/or WTO rules flouted, agri-environment payments cannot begin to replace Welsh farm incomes”, the FUW said.


Read More

‘Agriculture is vital to the UK’s future’ – NFU Scotland demands good Brexit deal for farmers in election manifesto ‘Agriculture is vital to the UK’s future’ – NFU Scotland demands good Brexit deal for farmers in election manifesto
'Agriculture may not be well supported beyond 2020' - Brexit could see dairy farmers starved of R&D 'Agriculture may not be well supported beyond 2020' - Brexit could see dairy farmers starved of R&D
Defra’s ‘natural capital’ approach to protecting environment under fire Defra’s ‘natural capital’ approach to protecting environment under fire
EU farming chief rules out special Brexit deal on agriculture in a strongly-worded speech EU farming chief rules out special Brexit deal on agriculture in a strongly-worded speech
From the editor: PM's election gamble risks increasing farm scrutiny From the editor: PM's election gamble risks increasing farm scrutiny

BREXIT - WHAT IT MEANS FOR FARMING

BREXIT - WHAT IT MEANS FOR FARMING

The EU Referendum took place on Thursday, June 23 and the nation voted to leave the European Union.

 

Get all the latest Brexit news and analysis here

TwitterFacebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.

Most Recent

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS