Farmers Guradian
Topics
Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Arable Farming Magazine

Arable Farming Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

CropTec

LAMMA 2018

New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
Login or Register
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days
Already a Member?

Login | Join us now

Scotland risks being left behind by GM 'no' stance

NFU Scotland’s Rob Livesey claimed the Scottish Government’s approach to GM stifled rational debate


Twitter Facebook
Twitter Facebook
Richard Lochhead announced in August the growing of GM would be banned in Scotland
Richard Lochhead announced in August the growing of GM would be banned in Scotland

Scotland’s farmers and scientific community could be consigned to a ’technological backwater’ by the Scottish Government’s approach to genetically modified (GM) crops, NFU Scotland has said.

 

NFUS vice-president Rob Livesey was scathing of the Scottish Government’s approach on the subject, which he claimed had suppressed rational debate.

 

He said: “The current stance of Scottish Government is disappointing, as saying no to real research will inevitably lead to Scotland being left behind.

 

“Farmers have mixed views on the potential offered by GM, but Scottish Government’s flawed approach to decision-making has stifled proper debate and left farmers feeling ill-informed.”

 

He clarified he was neither for or against GM technology.

 

In August, cabinet secretary Richard Lochhead announced the growing of GM in Scotland would be banned. NFUS said this decision was taken without consulting the food, farming and scientific sectors.

 

He added: “We are being asked to produce clean, safe and healthy food, but red tape and regulation, much of it emanating from Scottish Government, already means we are operating with one arm and one leg tied behind our backs.

 

“We are also being challenged to keep our crops healthy when the number of plant protection products available to us is diminishing.

 

“Could GM and Scotland’s world-leading scientific community have helped us in our dilemma? We needed to have this discussion before, not after, Richard Lochhead took his decision.”

 

The claims came before Mr Livesey spoke at the British Ecological Society’s GM debate at the Royal Society of Edinburgh on Wednesday.

 

“I fully accept the fundamental principle we must supply what our customers and consumers want and it would be pointless to produce a product which had no market or, at best, sold at a discounted price," he said.

 

“However, the Scottish Government’s assumption that keeping Scotland free from GM means the value of our products will be greater in monetary terms is dangerous.”


Read More

Arable profitability and Scotland's farming brands under scrutiny Arable profitability and Scotland's farming brands under scrutiny
Defra approves field trials of GM fish oil plants Defra approves field trials of GM fish oil plants
GM or not GM? Why key decisions on new technology will shape EU plant breeding GM or not GM? Why key decisions on new technology will shape EU plant breeding
MEPs challenge EU Commission to rethink GM animal feed ban MEPs challenge EU Commission to rethink GM animal feed ban
Royal Society calls for reassessment of GM ban Royal Society calls for reassessment of GM ban

Twitter Facebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS