Farmers Guardian
News
Word ‘milk’ banned for use in branding of plant-based products

Word ‘milk’ banned for use in branding of plant-based products

This Is Agriculture - Sponsored

This Is Agriculture - Sponsored

DataHub

DataHub

Auction Finder

Auction Finder

LAMMA 2020

LAMMA 2020

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days or subscribe for unlimited access.

Subscribe | Register

Metaldehyde slug pellet ban overturned following legal challenge

A High Court order has overturned the decision to ban metaldehyde slug pellet products, with immediate effect.

The High Court has approved an order, agreed this week by the company that challenged the legality of the ban, that formally overturns the December 2018 Defra ruling to withdraw all products containing metaldehyde, with immediate effect.


Read More

‘Very disappointing’ metaldehyde ban will have major impact on UK farmers‘Very disappointing’ metaldehyde ban will have major impact on UK farmers
Call for metaldehyde withdrawal period to be extendedCall for metaldehyde withdrawal period to be extended
Extension on metaldehyde slug pellet products withdrawal period not grantedExtension on metaldehyde slug pellet products withdrawal period not granted
Metaldehyde ban court challengeMetaldehyde ban court challenge

The legal basis of Defra’s withdrawal decision required the former Secretary of State for the Environment, Michael Gove to form his own view on the impact of the metaldehyde products on non-target species, but he did not do so.

Unlawful

 

Philip Tavener of Chiltern Farm Chemicals, who took the legal action to bring Michael Gove’s decision before the High Court says: “A few days before a hearing was due to take place in the High Court, the government conceded that its decision-making process was flawed. The decision was unlawful.

“Metaldehyde is back on the market and we’ve reverted to where we were eight months ago.

 

“The sell-out and use-up periods previously put in place no longer apply; it’s business as usual.”

 

Taking the metaldehyde status back to pre December 2018, the Court’s order confirms that the applications for product re-authorisation remain outstanding, and Defra are required to decide afresh as to whether to grant re-authorisation for the products or to revoke the existing authorisations, in accordance with Article 46 of the EC Regulation.

TwitterFacebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.

Most Recent

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS