Farmers Guradian
Topics
Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Nine ways to keep your farm vehicles safe

Arable Farming Magazine

Arable Farming Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

Dairy Farmer Magazine

British Farming Awards

CropTec

LAMMA 2019

New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
Login or Register
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now
New to Farmers Guardian?
Register Now

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days or subscribe for unlimited access.

Subscribe | Register

Michael Gove's embrace of gene editing prompts 'Frankencow' backlash

NFU chief livestock advisor John Royle urged caution over livestock gene editing over concerns it was not acceptable to consumers.


Alex   Black

Twitter Facebook
Alex   Black
Twitter Facebook
Share This

Gove's embrace of gene editing prompts 'Frankencow' backlash

The NFU has expressed concern about Defra Secretary Michael Gove’s embrace of gene editing technology, which he claimed could help livestock farmers remove vulnerabilities to illness and develop more valuable animals.

 

In his speech at Oxford Farming Conference, Mr Gove welcomed the technological advances in this area, suggesting they offered the possibility of ‘conquering’ human and animal diseases.


Read More

Farmers 'cautiously positive' as Gove promises support payments until 2024 Farmers 'cautiously positive' as Gove promises support payments until 2024
Farming groups react to Gove’s commitment to maintain farm subsidies post-Brexit Farming groups react to Gove’s commitment to maintain farm subsidies post-Brexit
Fears over regulatory burden for farmers as 25-year Environment Plan published Fears over regulatory burden for farmers as 25-year Environment Plan published
Gove speech: A look at life after BPS for arable farmers Gove speech: A look at life after BPS for arable farmers
Gove speech: What farmers should consider when drafting legal documents Gove speech: What farmers should consider when drafting legal documents

But NFU chief livestock advisor John Royle was nervous of consumer reaction to genetically edited meat.

 

Mr Gove’s speech has already prompted criticism from campaigners, with the Daily Mail reporting it could lead to ‘Frankencows’.

 

Mr Royle said: “I am not so sure it is commercially viable. I think we have got to be mindful about consumer perceptions. People want higher welfare, good health and animals which have lived a good life.

 

“It has got this connotation animals live in a less natural way.”

 

Credentials

 

He added the industry needed to demonstrate its environmental, high welfare and health credentials to the public.

 

The backlash to Mr Gove’s speech continued with campaign group GM Watch accusing him of ‘disingenuously’ mixing medical applications of genome editing for curing diseases with editing of animals.

 

In a statement, the group claimed medical uses were largely non-contentious and could progress entirely independently of food crop and animal research.

 

The statement continued: “But genome editing of animals and food crops is wildly unpopular and entails the risk of producing off-target effects which pass undetected to consumers.”

 

Conventional techniques

 

Instead of focusing on gene editing, Mr Royle suggested farmers exploit more conventional techniques, alongside practices such as genomic mapping, to breed the best animals for meat and dairy.

 

He said: “We can still use this effectively to make sure we use the right bulls on the right cows.”

FG subs FINAL 2017

Twitter Facebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS