Farmers Guardian
News
Word ‘milk’ banned for use in branding of plant-based products

Word ‘milk’ banned for use in branding of plant-based products

This Is Agriculture - Sponsored

This Is Agriculture - Sponsored

DataHub

DataHub

Auction Finder

Auction Finder

LAMMA 2020

LAMMA 2020

You are viewing your 1 free article

Register now to receive 2 free articles every 7 days or subscribe for unlimited access.

Subscribe | Register

US Agriculture Secretary slams European ruling on gene editing

Last week’s European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling which subjected gene editing (GE) to the same regulations which cover genetic modification (GM) has been slammed by the USA.

TwitterFacebook
US Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue
US Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue
Share This

US Agriculture Secretary slams European ruling on gene editing

Sonny Perdue, the US Agriculture Secretary, branded the ruling a ‘setback’ in an extraordinarily critical statement.

 

GE speeds up traditional breeding processes, allowing insect- or disease-resistant varieties of crops or breeds of animals to be developed quickly by replacing one DNA sequence with another.

 

Unlike GM, no foreign DNA is inserted into a gene edited organism, which is why the rules surrounding GE had been unclear until the ECJ ruling.

 

Mr Perdue said: “Government policies should encourage scientific innovation without creating unnecessary barriers or unjustifiably stigmatising new technologies.


Read More

Brexit could open the door to genetically modified foodBrexit could open the door to genetically modified food
Brexit White Paper – Everything farmers need to knowBrexit White Paper – Everything farmers need to know
Chequers will not stop UK embracing gene editing tech, says EusticeChequers will not stop UK embracing gene editing tech, says Eustice
EU ‘would not know’ if gene-edited crops ended up on sale in EuropeEU ‘would not know’ if gene-edited crops ended up on sale in Europe
EU Ministers consider updating GM regs after ECJ ruling on gene editingEU Ministers consider updating GM regs after ECJ ruling on gene editing

“Unfortunately, this week’s ECJ ruling is a setback in this regard in that it narrowly considers newer genome editing methods to be within the scope of the EU’s regressive and outdated regulations governing GMOs.

 

“We encourage the EU to seek input from the scientific and agricultural communities, as well as its trading partners, in determining the appropriate implementation of the ruling.”

 

Defra Secretary Michael Gove has previously embraced the prospect of expanding GE technology, telling 2018’s Oxford Farming Conference it offered the possibility of conquering human and animal diseases.

 

But it is not clear how far the UK could go in diverging from EU rules on GE under the ‘common rule book’ proposed by the Chequers agreement.

Current EU regulations require all GMOs to have authorisation before they can be placed on the market, making the topic a likely sticking point in any future UK-US trade talks.

 

UK industry and scientific bodies have condemned the ECJ ruling, but others, including MEP Molly Scott Cato, have supported it.

 

In an exclusive piece for Farmers Guardian’s Brexit hub, Ms Scott Cato said the effects of developing and cultivating gene-edited crops or other organisms are ‘little known and could have extremely damaging effects’.

TwitterFacebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.

Most Recent

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS