ao link
Farmers Guardian
News
Over The Farm Gate

Over The Farm Gate

This Is Agriculture - Sponsored

This Is Agriculture - Sponsored

DataHub

DataHub

Auction Finder

Auction Finder

LAMMA 2021

LAMMA 2021

Clear conversation needed on gene editing in order to convince public

The industry needs to make ‘absolutely clear’ that gene editing (GE) is very different to genetic modification (GM) if it is to sell the technology to the UK public.

NFU Sugar board chairman, Michael Sly
NFU Sugar board chairman, Michael Sly

Speaking during the plant health session at NFU Conference, Tom Bradshaw said: “GE is very different to GM. We need to be absolutely clear that GE is speeding up plant breeding. It could be done by current plant breeding methods. If we confuse that discussion, then we are going to confuse the public and we won’t win [the debate]. It’s critical we’re absolutely clear that GE should be allowed.”


Read More

Have your say on gene editing as Government consultation opensHave your say on gene editing as Government consultation opens
Nobel Prize in Chemistry awarded to women who discovered CRISPR gene editingNobel Prize in Chemistry awarded to women who discovered CRISPR gene editing
Three-quarters of UK farmers would adopt GM crop technology if UK regs changedThree-quarters of UK farmers would adopt GM crop technology if UK regs changed
EU Ministers consider updating GM regs after ECJ ruling on gene editingEU Ministers consider updating GM regs after ECJ ruling on gene editing
Chequers will not stop UK embracing gene editing tech, says EusticeChequers will not stop UK embracing gene editing tech, says Eustice

Solutions

 

Michael Sly, NFU Sugar board chairman added that CRISPR gene editing was already offering solutions to problems in sugar beet through research at Nottingham University.

 

He said: “Once we move into the [Brexit] transition period and out the other side there is that debate to be had with Government and our consumers that it isn’t about GM, it’s about editing and there’s some real opportunities there. It will be incumbent on us all to act together with sound science and public opinion to drive that debate.”

 

He added: “It’s a solution to our PPPs and a good news story for the consumer, because we will be using much less of these products that they don’t want us to use.”

Transparency

 

However, Defra’s Holly Yates added that last time there was a major public discussion about the technology there was a major kickback.

 

She said: “The first thing that would need to be considered in looking at this again, is how do you build public trust and build transparency, and how do you have a sensible discussion about how you can achieve benefits to the consumer?”

TwitterFacebook
Post a Comment
To see comments and join in the conversation please log in.

Most Recent

Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
RSS